Preliminary Design Review

The PDR requirements have now been updated for URC2024!

Preliminary Design Review

Preliminary Design Review Reports are due no later than 11:59pm Mountain Standard Time (MST; UTC-7) on December 1, 2023. PDR Reports much be submitted through this Google Form.

Format and Submission Details

Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Reports are limited to a total of 4 pages. Pages 1-2 may contain text and graphics (images, figures, etc.); pages 3-4 may only contain graphics with captions. Pages should be in letter paper size (8.5 in. x 11 in.), with margins no smaller than 1 in. (2.5 cm), text in Calibri 11 point font (or similarly sized font), and single spaced. Graphics and images are allowed within the page limit. PDR Reports may be submitted at any time prior to the deadline, and will be reviewed by judges on a rolling basis. PDR Reports must be submitted no later than the due date (December 1, 2023). This is a considered a non-competitive review milestone, meaning that reports will only be assessed on their own merits.

A header at the top of the first page must identify the URC team's name, university, city and country, the student team lead, and an additional optional point of contact.

Electronic submissions are required in *.pdf file format only. Files should be uploaded via a form link that will be sent directly to Student Team Leads (the file may be uploaded by any student team member with a Google account).

Report Content

The PDR Report is expected to focus on the team structure, resources, project management plan, and preliminary technical design. Judges will be assessing each team's overall level of readiness to undertake the URC competition, specifically whether teams will be ready to submit a System Acceptance Review package by early March, and be prepared to compete by June (if selected). Judges view this report as a tool that will help teams to solidify and articulate the essential elements of a successful team early in the competition cycle.

The following are essential elements of information that teams are required to address. Teams may discuss any other topics that they feel are appropriate.

1. Team Structure

Discuss your team's structure, to include the leadership and overall membership. A summary of the backgrounds of team members (which academic departments are represented, relevant experience, etc.) should also be discussed. Briefly discuss your team’s recruiting/training plans, and educational/public outreach plans (note: educational outreach is different than your team's recruiting plan).

2. Team Resources

Discuss your team's financial and facility resources. This should include a budget, your fundraising and financial management plan, and your access to appropriate design and fabrication spaces. Finances should be listed in USD (United States Dollars). The budget should be presented as a table, including income categories and total to date, expense categories, total required, funding required, and income sources that satisfy the deficit (if any).

Simply stating that you will build a budget and raise funds is considered insufficient - please describe your budget, fundraising plan, etc.

3. Project Management Plan

Discuss your team's overall approach to the URC system development life cycle (e.g. plan, design, manufacture, integrate, test). This plan should explain how you intend to solve the problems, not necessarily the exact solution. Technical design details may be provided to support the project management plan discussion.

Additional required elements of the Project Management Plan include:

The Gantt chart should include at least the period September, 2023 through June, 2024. Specify when the team is testing remote communication, navigation, manipulation and science tasks required for competition. The chart must be of sufficient resolution so it is readable when enlarged.

4. Preliminary Technical Design

Teams should present their preliminary technical design for major rover systems (e.g. mobility, communications, arm, command and control, science payload). Details are encouraged, but not required.


Teams may be penalized for violating the format requirements, failing to provide proper citations, or other critical issues as assessed by the judges.

Tips From the Judges